On May 27, 2025, in Goma, Corneille Nangaa, alongside her comrades of the AFC/M23 movement, met Joseph Kabila, former president of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). This event, marking a notable stage in the political landscape of the region, raises several essential questions on the current state of governance and security in the DRC, as well as on the prospects of a constructive dialogue.
The meeting between Nangaa and Kabila, although presented as a simple contact, intervenes in a complex context, marked by the presence of the AFC/M23 movement in a province of North Kivu plagued by tensions. The implications of this geopolitical framework are palpable. Goma, as the chief town of province, is emblematic of the security challenges that afflict the whole region: increasing insecurity, confrontations between armed groups, and impact on the civilian population which suffers from the consequences of this instability.
Kabila, having recently broken prolonged silence on state affairs, expressed a severe analysis of current management, evoking what he considers “non -orthodox governance”. It raises concrete concerns such as corruption and diversion of public funds, tangible impacts that hinder development and exacerbate the suffering of the population. The former president draws attention to the fact that mismanagement contributes to a deterioration of living conditions, in particular by unemployment, wage arrears and a rise in crime. These elements, although already known to many observers, deserve sustained attention when they are often repeated without a concrete solution.
The project of a “citizen pact” that Kabila plans to highlight, articulated around twelve key points, could seem as an attempt to straighten a perceived situation as chaotic. However, it is crucial to question the viability of such commitments. How could a citizen pact really contribute to weaving bonds of trust between the different stakeholders, especially in a context where Kabila’s legitimacy is both questioned and challenged following the lifting of his immunities by the Senate? The cleavage between those who governed and those who are in opposition is a central element, and the possibility of a real dialogue sometimes seems hindered by historical distrusts.
The approach that Kabila wishes to adopt, consisting in meeting various strata of society, including female organizations, community leaders and religious denominations, is beneficial. But what will be the substance of these exchanges and how will they be translated into concrete actions? The consultation of the various actors could be seen as an inclusive approach, but the question remains as to the way in which the opinions expressed will be integrated into a global policy.
The situation in the DRC, and especially in North Kivu, requires a peaceful voice and a frank dialogue to move forward. Beyond political considerations, the life of millions of Congolese is at stake, and any failure to approach the questions raised could cause tragic consequences. The actors present, whether political, economic or community, have a role to play in the search for sustainable solutions.
It is also relevant to wonder how these events will influence the relations of the DRC with neighboring countries, especially Rwanda, which plays an active role in regional conflicts. A complex regional dynamic must be integrated into any reflection on the levers of peace and stability in the DRC.
This episode could represent an opportunity for appeasement and renewal for the country, provided that all parties involved adopt a constructive approach, aimed beyond immediate interests, the prosperity of a state in search of peace and cohesion. Vigilance, dialogue and a sincere desire for changes are imperatives to consider a better future for the DRC.