### Tshikapa: towards a conflict resolution linked to demolitions within the framework of the Tshilejelu project?
On May 15, 2025, the inhabitants of the avenues Likasi 1 and 2 in Tshikapa, in the province of Kasai in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, expressed themselves on a question crucially sensitive: the compensation of the victims of the demolitions of their plots within the framework of the Tshilejelu project, initiated by the government. This situation highlights several issues related to land rights, the responsibility of the authorities and the struggles that communities lead daily to be heard.
Talked during a meeting, André Kanku, representing the inhabitants concerned, spoke of an already well -known problem in many regions of the country: the lack of notice for demolitions and the lack of adequate solution for those who find themselves caught. “We are soliciting the involvement of the competent authorities to restore us in our rights,” he said. This request highlights an appeal to social justice, but also to the recognition of urban planning standards which, according to him, should have been respected.
The Tshilejelu project, which aims to modernize and improve infrastructure in the region, is undeniably essential for the development of Tshikapa. However, it is crucial to ensure that this need for revitalization is not done to the detriment of the rights of citizens. The response of the provincial minister for infrastructure and public works, Muamba Muamba Pierre, raises other questions about the role and responsibilities of the authorities when it comes to balance development and protection of land rights.
### A legal framework in question
The question of indemnities in the event of expropriation or demolition is often governed by laws which should, in theory, protect the interests of citizens. However, in contexts like that of Tshikapa, it is essential to wonder if these laws are applied adequately. The statement of the minister that “no fees is provided for compensating demolished plots” arouses strong concerns. Such a position could strengthen the feeling of injustice among the affected populations.
It is important to emphasize that the absence of a budget envelope intended for compensation may have serious impact on impacted families, who see their livelihoods disappear without any compensation. The question therefore arises: how does the state intend to guarantee the protection of the rights of these inhabitants while continuing its infrastructure projects?
### A call for consultation
With such issues, it seems imperative to open a dialogue between the authorities and the inhabitants of Tshikapa. The authorities should seek to establish consultation mechanisms in order to listen to the votes of citizens and respond to their concerns. A fair compensation policy could not only contribute to social peace, but also strengthen confidence between citizens and their rulers.
It is also necessary to assess the impact of such projects on social cohesion. Demolitions can indeed create tensions in a community, exacerbating feelings of mistrust towards the authorities. This could also have implications for social unity, essential for peace and prosperity in already fragile regions.
### Conclusion
The situation in Tshikapa, although it illustrates the frequent tensions between development and rights of citizens, also offers a relevant opportunity to reflect on the way governments and communities can collaborate for a more inclusive future. The Tshilejelu project can be an opportunity for growth and modernization, but it is crucial that this dynamic is to respect the rights of the inhabitants.
While the Minister has also announced rehabilitation projects, such as that of Tshikapa National Airport, it should be hoped that the commitment for development will be accompanied by a desire for dialogue and respect for rights. In a context where each voice counts, the call of the inhabitants of the Likasi avenues could well be the beginning of a positive change towards better governance and sustainable social justice.