** Togo at the forefront of African mediation: a new dynamic in hand of President Gnassingbé **
In an international context marked by geopolitical tensions and humanitarian crises, the potential appointment of Faure Gnassingbé, Togolese president, as mediator of the African Union (AU) between the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Rwanda is more than a simple diplomatic formality. It illustrates not only the persistent challenges in East Africa, but also the rise of new African actors on the front of the regional political scene.
This proposal occurred at a videoconferencing meeting at the AU conference office, led by Angolan President João Lourenço, who recently announced his withdrawal from this delicate role. Lourenço’s decision, after two years of mediation, highlights an urgent need to renew the dynamics of dialogue, thus stressing the importance of continuity to maintain constructive discussions between Kinshasa and Kigali.
The situation in the east of the DRC, where the fighting between various armed groups continue to affect millions of civilians, requires a collective and coherent approach, modernly modern by facilitators capable of listening and considering all the prospects. In this sense, Faure Gnassingbé represents an interesting choice, given his experience in regional diplomacy and his political career. However, it should not be lost in sight that the complexity of this crisis does not only reside in antagonisms between the DRC and Rwanda but also in the interlacing of regional and international interests which exacerbates these tensions.
## A new wave of diplomatic commitment
There is no doubt that the versatility of Faure Gnassingbé could enrich the mediation process. In addition, his approach could be inspired by the successes and failures of the different mediations carried out by other allied countries. Take the example of Qatar’s facilitation efforts which, although more discreet, are also trying to play a role in resolving conflicts in the region. This multiplicity of initiatives raises the crucial question of the coordination of diplomatic efforts.
In 2021, around 19 international mediations had been identified in the region, and their results varied considerably: advances in certain negotiations, such as those between Sudan and South Sudan, to resounding failures in cases such as the conflict between the DRC to its neighbors. The prospect of several mediators from different countries could lead to a fragmentation of negotiation efforts, creating rivalries between these initiatives rather than promoting collaborative dynamic.
## A climate of cooperation or conflict?
The role of Togo in this new diplomatic momentum is just as much a challenge as an opportunity. If Faure Gnassingbé is actually confirmed in this role, he will have to sail in a complex political environment. Recent analyzes on regional diplomacy show that mediators are often faced with a perceived phenomenon of legitimacy – where the effectiveness of negotiations will largely depend on the recognition and acceptance of its role by stakeholders.
Relations between Kinshasa and Kigali are particularly tense due to persistent allegations of Rwandan military support to rebel groups operating in the DRC. To cope with this explosive situation, an image of impartiality and neutrality is crucial. Togo, as a relatively less involved nation in this crisis, could indeed play this role, but it remains to prove that the interests defended by Gnassingbé will not be perceived as biased.
## Conclusion: a turning point for Africa?
In all cases, these recent developments have a precious opportunity to strengthen the role of African actors in resolving local conflicts. The potential choice of Faure Gnassingbé as a mediator could thus symbolize a paradigm shift, where Africa would no longer be only the theater of conflicts, but also a major player in the search for solutions.
As we advance towards this possible appointment, it is essential to follow consultations and formal validation by the Assembly of Heads of State and Government of the AU. This decisive step could not only shape the future of African diplomacy but also have lasting repercussions on peace and stability throughout the region. The coming days could therefore mark a turning point for the construction of political resilience on the continent.
The situation remains fluid, and the world will carefully observe the future strategic movements. The challenge for Faure Gnassingbé and the AU will be to tend towards a mediation process that is inclusive and truly representative of the expectations of actors on the ground.