** Conflict between militiamen Mibléo and FARDC: a synergy of violence and despair in the heart of the Democratic Republic of Congo **
The conflict between the Miblongo militiamen to the Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of Congo (FARDC) recently made the front page of the news, particularly during the clashes that occurred in the night of February 22 in the Kwamouth region, as well as Near Mongata, in the town of Maluku. This renewed violence is symptomatic of a larger problem that affects the whole country, both security and socio-economic.
### A historical context rich in tensions
To fully understand the dynamics of this confrontation, it is crucial to interfere in the recent history of the DRC. The Miblongo militiamen have trained in a context where local populations feel a deep feeling of abandonment, faced with the inability of the State to guarantee their security and to meet their basic needs. Historically, these armed groups often emerge in territories where the state is deemed incapable or absent. In the case of Miblondo, their ascent is largely the result of the frustrations caused by decades of negligence of rural areas by the national authorities.
### A force force by the FARDC and its limits
The military actions carried out by the FARDC, such as those reported in recent days with a report of nine militiamen killed and recovered weapons, bring out a largely reactive rather than preventive approach. Although indisputable in the fight against insecurity, these operations are often perceived by the population as late and insufficient responses. Reality on the ground shows a spiral of violence that only intensifies, particularly affecting the most vulnerable, such as women and children, who are often left behind in this cycle of violence.
### Economic stake and resource struggle
From an economic point of view, the recent tensions around the flight of livestock by Miblongo militiamen illustrate another fundamental aspect of the conflict. Cattle not only represents a livelihood for farmers, but also a symbol of wealth and social status. The looting carried out by militiamen are not simply acts of banditry, but a desperate strategy to control the few resources that exist in these regions, thus exacerbating a cycle of poverty. According to studies carried out by local organizations, the destruction of farms and the flight of livestock cause loss of income which can reach up to 30% for farmers in these areas.
### A call to a constructive dialogue
Faced with this chaotic situation, the invitation launched by the FARDC to the militiamen so that they go and lay their weapons presents a path that might seem promising. However, this appeal must be accompanied by a framework for true dialogue, where the concerns of the populations would be heard and integrated. Reintegration into the social fabric of veterans requires innovative approaches going beyond military repression, including initiatives for economic development, education and reconciliation.
### Conclusion
Recent events in Kwamouth and Mongata articulate a human and socio-economic drama which highlights the structural deficiencies of the Congolese state. They also reveal the urgent need for a multifaceted strategy include effective territorial action, support for local development and inclusive dialogue with all stakeholders. The sustainable resolution of this crisis will only be able to emerge if we take into account the deep roots of dissatisfaction, rather than limited to a repetitive and ultimately, ineffective military approach. Consequently, the challenge is not only to restore order, but to achieve a lasting and inclusive peace which strengthens the resilience of communities in the face of violence and systemic poverty.
Thus, it is imperative that political, military and social actors combine their efforts to offer a perspective of true peace in a Democratic Republic of Congo still haunted by its past.