While the summit on artificial intelligence (AI) is looming in Paris on February 10 and 11, a crucial issue emerges: that of the governance of this technology, at a time when AA asserts itself as a power instrument geopolitics. Co-organized by French President Emmanuel Macron and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, this event aims to bring together global leaders, technology business leaders and experts to discuss the ethical, economic and security implications of AI.
### A ramp -up of non -traditional actors
This summit is a reflection of a geopolitical transformation where non -state actors, such as technology companies, take the front of the stage. The recent emergence of the Chinese company Deepseek, which launched a chatbot competing with Western leaders like Chatgpt, illustrates this dynamic. Developed at a lower cost, this AI model asserts itself as a potential threat to the technological supremacy of the United States. Far from being a simple commercial issue, this competition is part of a broader framework of global rivalry, where technological innovation and data control become strategic deposits as crucial as natural resources.
### to technological multipolarity
The French approach asserts itself as a response to this dynamic by targeting a form of multipolarity in the development of AI. By not aligning exclusively on the United States, as Nick Reiners, senior analyst at Eurasia Group points out, Macron wants to promote the emergence of alternatives, such as the French startup Mistral, while facilitating access to data essential. This strategic shift raises the question of technological innovation at the service of major societal causes such as health or the environment, thus contributing to sustainable and inclusive development.
### An ethical reflection more than a legal agreement
It is essential to note that, like the previous summits, no binding regulations should result from this meeting. This underlines an inherent paradox at AI: while potential dangers are increasingly well documented, the political response often oscillates between laudable intentions and concrete actions. A recent evaluation on the potential threats of the general AI has highlighted risks such as disinformation, vulnerability to cyber attacks or the management of algorithmic biases. However, the absence of a solid international legal framework testifies to an inability to achieve consensus on minimum ethical standards.
## developed American strategy
On the American front, Trump’s administration recently displayed its intention to make the United States the “world capital of AI”The exploitation of American energy reserves to support this industry eager for energy highlights a new phase of militarization of technological innovation. This discourse reflects an urgent need for strategic positioning, but it also helps to exacerbate tensions with The EU, which Trump has described as “taxation” on American companies.
Assign the entire world ecosystem.
### An interconnection with global repercussions
Beyond political debates, these geopolitical strategies on AI will inevitably seize the destinies of developing countries. A growing technological fracture could hatch if poor nations do not have access to AI advances. The theme of technological justice should be integrated into binding dialogues, in order to ensure that the benefits of this technology do not remain the prerogative of a minority. Indeed, the data, essential for the training of AI models, should be considered as a common good rather than a simple commercial product.
### Conclusion: towards a new technological order
In the end, this artificial intelligence summit could mark a turning point in the way nations are considering this technology at the dawn of a multipolar world. The real challenge remains the capacity of actors to transcend their nationalist interests in favor of a sustainable collaborative framework. While AI continues to redefine the geopolitical landscape, it will be essential to encourage an inclusive dialogue, which is not limited to major powers, but also engages the often neglected votes of developing countries. By doing so, the international community could not only sail the tumultuous waters of AI, but also lay the foundations of a more equitable and lasting future.