Why could the withdrawal of Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso from ECOWAS redefine the geopolitical balance in West Africa?

**The Breakup of ESA: A Worrying Turning Point for West Africa**

January 29, 2025 will mark a pivotal moment in West African history with the withdrawal of Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso from ECOWAS. This departure, motivated by a cocktail of political and economic frustrations, raises questions about the capacity of regional institutions to adapt to new realities. While intra-regional trade, already weak, risks further collapsing, security in the region could also suffer, increasing isolation in the face of a growing security crisis. This change could also pave the way for new international alliances, however risky. In short, this defection should not be seen as a simple withdrawal, but as an opportunity to rethink regional cooperation, essential for a peaceful and prosperous future.
**The Breakup of ESA: A New Era for West Africa or a Coming Crisis?**

January 29, 2025 will mark a historic turning point for West Africa with the official exit of Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso from the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). This decision, which goes beyond a simple official withdrawal, raises fundamental questions about the relevance and viability of regional blocs on the continent.

### A Changing Landscape: The Reasons for the Withdrawal

This defection of three influential members of ESA is the result of a complex combination of political, economic and social factors. Firmly rooted in a history of colonialism and repeated political instability, these countries have been embroiled in a struggle to regain their sovereignty while seeking to meet the expectations of their populations. Their governments, often facing internal insurgencies and security challenges, have blamed ECOWAS for its inability to provide an effective response to the region’s humanitarian and security crises.

Like the failure of supranational structures in other parts of the world, growing disillusionment with ESA raises questions about the ability of regional institutions to adapt to contemporary realities. Cultural differences, historical rivalries, and divergent priorities among member states can create fertile ground for friction, making collaboration more difficult.

### Economic implications: a blow to regional integration

ECOWAS is intended to facilitate trade and economic integration in the region. However, the exit of these three countries could have significant repercussions on trade. Intra-regional trade, already limited – representing only about 13% of West African states’ overall trade – risks declining further. According to studies, the withdrawal could also jeopardize development efforts and exacerbate economic vulnerabilities in the countries concerned.

Maintaining existing trade and movement arrangements, as announced by ECOWAS, is an effort to mitigate the immediate consequences of this rupture. However, this approach may prove insufficient in the long term. Global economic reality suggests that open markets and regional cooperation are crucial for economic growth. Without these synergies, the Sahel countries, already lagging economically, could see their recovery jeopardized.

### Regional security: the Sahel challenge

On the security front, the decision to withdraw from ECOWAS raises palpable concerns. The Sahel region is facing a major security crisis, marked by the rise of jihadist groups and other non-state actors. Regional security cooperation is essential, as the fight against terrorism knows no borders.

The countries concerned risk finding themselves isolated, which could hamper their ability to develop collective security policies. In addition, armed groups often take advantage of the climate of instability to extend their influence, thus threatening the peace and security of populations. In this context, a withdrawal from ECOWAS could be perceived as a regression rather than an advancement.

### In search of alternatives: towards new alliances?

As Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso distance themselves from ESA, they could turn to other regional or international alliances. The potential creation of new integration or cooperation blocs could come into play, notably by seeking partnerships with external powers.

However, such a reorientation does not come without challenges. The diversification of allies, as illustrated by the establishment of closer relations with powers such as Russia or Turkey, also raises ethical and strategic questions. These orientations could exacerbate international tensions and worsen the region’s isolation within multilateral institutions.

### Conclusion: An uncertain future

The withdrawal of Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso from ECOWAS represents an inflection point that could redefine the political, economic and security future of West Africa. Although the challenges facing these countries are immense, the solution does not lie solely in distancing themselves from existing structures, but rather in adapting these structures to the realities of the moment.

The example of this defection should encourage the leaders of other member states to revisit the modalities of regional cooperation. If African countries truly wish to take their destiny into their own hands, they must learn to work together while respecting the diversity that makes the continent rich. The key lies in creating a more inclusive and responsive regional platform, tailored to the needs and aspirations of its members.

Thus, at a time when West Africa finds itself at a crossroads, it is crucial that States rethink their approach to regional solidarity to build a better future.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *