### Kinshasa: A storm in an economic teacup
Twenty hours after the violent demonstrations that shook Kinshasa, a precarious calm has returned, but the socio-economic situation in the Congolese capital remains worrying. The recent demonstrations, triggered by popular anger at the occupation of Goma by the Rwandan army and the M23, had an immediate impact on commercial activity, particularly at the large “Zando” market, a true barometer of the local economy.
The image of a post-demonstration Kinshasa is that of a city with a wounded soul, where commercial activities are timidly resuming. The testimonies collected report fears of a new cycle of violence and vandalism, thus creating a climate of economic uncertainty. It is observed that, in a city where 70% of the population depends on small informal activities, the fear of chaos hinders the dynamics of consumption. A worker on Tabuley Avenue sums up this collective anxiety well, recalling that “the Congolese live from day to day; if he doesn’t go out, he won’t eat either.”
### A survival economy undermined
The situation is all the more worrying since the majority of residents survive thanks to daily activities. Small restaurateurs, sellers of school supplies and street traders are witnessing real economic stagnation. Managing a small restaurant is becoming a real headache, as highlighted by a young restaurateur, who had to resort to selling off remaining meals at a discount, anticipating a significant drop in her clientele.
To illustrate the impact of this climate of insecurity on the local economy, it is revealing to see that key sectors such as the sale of food products or school supplies have been characterized by a drop in sales since the beginning of the month. This phenomenon is amplified by warnings of potential violent events. Statistics show that during times of unrest, impulse purchases decrease by almost 50%, confirming the fragility of this informal economy.
### A surge of solidarity transformed into tension
The peaceful demonstration that began as a surge of solidarity towards Goma quickly turned into riots, demonstrating the volatility of popular discontent. The contrast between the need to support a common cause and the explosion of violence highlights the difficulties of a young democracy, where socio-economic frustrations are often expressed through acts of anger. By allowing uncontrolled elements to take advantage of the situation, the uprisings lose their initial meaning and further disrupt the economic fabric.
In addition, it is useful to unravel the perception of violence in public discourse. It is often seen as a sign of despair and disorganization. However, a sociological approach will show that these demonstrations are also the result of a systemic exclusion of certain sections of the population, exacerbated by a persistent economic crisis. The rise in violence could be analyzed as a cry of despair, a request for help that often remains ignored by local administrations.
### Towards an uncertain stabilization
Following the events, the Congolese authorities, supported by the international community, will have to redouble their efforts to stabilize the situation. The security forces have tried to restore order, but the climate of fear and insecurity that permeates minds compromises any progress. A preliminary report from the human rights NGO, already alarming, evokes an intensification of tensions, and predicts dark days to come without a coherent and rapid intervention.
This context also represents an opportunity for the Congolese government to rethink its economic and social approach. An integrated action plan emphasizing local development, education, and support for small businesses could not only ease tensions, but also restore a modicum of confidence among a disillusioned population.
### Conclusion
As Kinshasa attempts to return to some semblance of normalcy, the major challenge lies in rebuilding a sustainable economic fabric. The recent protests are not just an isolated political crisis, but a mirror of the underlying frustrations of a population in search of dignity and livelihoods. The government’s response must not be limited to crisis management, but must generate a deep reflection on the aspirations and needs of all Congolese. True solidarity with Goma can then come through a commitment to a better economic future for all.