How to mobilize every Congolese for a truly inclusive constitutional revision?

**Towards an Inclusive Constitution: Katende’s Call to the Congolese**

In a context where governance issues are essential, Jean-Claude Katende, President of ASADHO, calls for the active involvement of every Congolese in the debate on the constitutional revision. He stresses the importance of inclusiveness, recalling that the Constitution must reflect the aspirations of all the people, and not be the preserve of an elite of experts. The mobilization of young people, who represent more than 60% of the population, is essential to bring innovation and dynamism to the discussions. While legal expertise is valuable, it must be balanced with citizen voices to guarantee the legitimacy of institutions. As a potential revision approaches, it is crucial to put in place dialogue mechanisms that allow every Congolese to actively participate in this fundamental process. The Constitution, beyond a simple text, must become the tool through which the Congolese assert their right to true democracy and dignity.
**The Debate on the Constitutional Revision: Towards an Inclusive Mobilization of the Congolese**

In a socio-political context where constitutional issues are crucial, the call by the president of the African Association for the Defense of Human Rights (ASADHO), Jean-Claude Katende, for the active involvement of each Congolese in the debate on the revision of the Constitution raises fundamental questions about how governance issues should be addressed. By opposing an exclusive appropriation of this debate by an elite of experts, Katende recalls that the Constitution is not only a technical document, but a reflection of the aspirations and realities of all the Congolese people.

### A Democracy to Redefine

The central argument put forward by Katende is based on the inclusiveness of the constitutional debate. It is essential to understand that the Constitution is, in essence, the expression of a social consensus. Therefore, the exclusion of citizens in discussions around its revision leads to a risk of alienation and a rise in distrust of institutions. For example, in many African countries, such as Tunisia or Ghana, successful constitutional revision processes have been those that have been able to mobilize civil society and promote broad consultations, including often marginalized groups, such as young people and women. These experiences have highlighted the importance of a participatory approach that restores the legitimacy of institutions.

### The Role of Youth in Constitutional Revision

By urging young Congolese to educate themselves and participate in the debate, Katende examines an essential social dynamic. In Congo, where more than 60% of the population is under 25, young people must become the actors of their own destiny. History of Social Movements reveals that when young people speak out, they bring innovation and dynamism to socio-political discussions. The protest movements in North Africa in 2011 or more recently the #EndSARS movement in Nigeria illustrate how youth can transform the political landscape by challenging established norms.

### The Challenges of Expertise

It is true that constitutional experts bring valuable expertise to the formulation of legislative texts. However, as Katende points out, their discourse can sometimes lack coherence and neutrality. Studies show that when experts are perceived as tools of the power in place, their influence is called into question. Between 2005 and 2020, several countries have experienced constitutional review failures, often due to a gap between the opinions of experts and those of the population. Contrasting the approaches of experts and civil society, it becomes clear that the viability of a constitutional revision rests on a harmonious balance between technical knowledge and popular aspirations.

### A Call to Action

This call for mobilization on constitutional issues is of burning relevance. The Constitution is the foundation of democracy, but it must evolve according to the needs of society. Will the Congolese be able to rewrite a text that takes into account contemporary challenges such as corruption, respect for human rights and inclusive governance? The path will remain strewn with pitfalls, especially given the political interests at stake.

### Future Perspectives

At the dawn of a potential constitutional revision, the question of citizen participation must be at the heart of concerns. Mechanisms that facilitate dialogue—forums, public debates, citizen consultations—must be put in place so that every voice can count. By drawing inspiration from internationally recognized models, Congo can aspire to a constitutional revision that reflects not only jurists, but also the social fabric in all its diversity.

In short, the debate on the revision of the Constitution should not be confined to experts. On the contrary, it must become a space for inclusive and democratic dialogue. This is where the very essence of democracy lies and the key to forging a future where every Congolese has a role to play in shaping their State. Far from being a simple document, the Constitution is the tool through which the Congolese can claim their right to dignity, justice and democracy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *