**Fatshimetrie: Pleading in the drilling case – crucial issues highlighted**
At the heart of the sensational trial concerning the construction of drilling in the Democratic Republic of Congo, the pleading hearing that was held highlighted the arguments of the defendants Mike Kasenga and François Rubota, supported by their respective lawyers. This crucial stage of the trial was an opportunity for both parties to present their defenses and attempt to convince the Court of Cassation of their innocence.
During this pleading, Mike Kasenga’s lawyer, Maître Laurent Kalengi, raised a series of key elements to support his client’s defense. In particular, he highlighted the impressive number of drilling stations already built and operational, as well as those currently under construction. These figures, which bear witness to the intense activity of the consortium, were presented as concrete elements demonstrating Mike Kasenga’s commitment to carrying out the planned projects. In addition, the lawyer highlighted the lack of tangible evidence demonstrating a possible embezzlement of funds to his client’s personal account, casting doubt on the accusations made by the public prosecutor.
For his part, François Rubota reiterated his exceptions regarding the jurisdiction of the Court of Cassation to judge the offenses with which he is accused. His lawyer, Maître Nyabirungu Mwene Songa, insisted on the lack of concrete evidence demonstrating his complicity in possible embezzlement of funds. By contesting the qualification of civil servant attributed to Mike Kasenga, Rubota sought to dismiss any responsibility on his part in the facts with which he is accused. In addition, the lawyer noted the lack of precision on the destination of the funds allegedly embezzled, emphasizing the importance of proving the allegations made by the public prosecutor.
Beyond the pleadings of the parties present, this trial reveals major issues in terms of transparency and the fight against corruption. Judicial debates help to inform public opinion on the mechanisms for controlling public funds and the responsibility of the actors involved in projects of such magnitude. The final decision of the Court of Cassation, expected on January 22, will be crucial for the future of this case and will send a strong signal regarding the fight against embezzlement and abuse of power within the administration.
In short, the pleadings in the DRC drilling case raise essential questions about governance and accountability in a context where transparency and integrity must be fundamental values. The upcoming verdict will be a turning point in this complex case, calling for impartial and rigorous justice to guarantee the probity of practices and the protection of the interests of the Congolese population.