The negotiations at COP16 against desertification in Riyadh ended without a binding agreement to effectively combat drought. This outcome has revealed obstacles to solving one of the most pressing environmental problems of our time.
Hopes for a bold decision to reverse the course of the drought catastrophe have faded, and stakeholders have had to admit that they need more time to reach a solid consensus. The challenges of drought, exacerbated by environmental destruction, pose not only a threat to the planet but also a huge financial impact, costing more than $300 billion each year.
African delegates, united as rarely before, made their voices heard in these negotiations, arguing for a binding agreement imposing concrete action plans to address drought. In contrast, developed countries seemed more inclined to favor a less binding framework, sparking crucial differences during the discussions.
Indigenous groups’ proposals for increased monitoring, early warning systems and tailored response plans were highlighted, highlighting the importance of a holistic approach to addressing this global challenge. Despite the lack of agreement at COP16, continued progress remains essential, with investments and subsidies allocated to sustainable soil and land management.
Restoring 1.5 billion hectares of land by the end of the decade is a major challenge, requiring significant financial resources. The commitments of over $12 billion at COP16 are encouraging, but additional efforts and strengthened international cooperation are still needed to achieve the targets set.
In conclusion, the fight against desertification and drought requires continued global mobilization. Despite the obstacles encountered at COP16, it is essential that governments, international organizations and civil society join forces to protect our lands and ensure a sustainable future for future generations.