The recent proposal for constitutional revision by President Félix Tshisekedi in Kinshasa has sparked a deep division within Congolese public opinion. Residents of the capital express diverse and contrasting opinions on this initiative, which fuels a passionate and often polarized debate. Through the testimonies collected by César Olombo, it is clear that opinions are divided and that the issues related to such a reform are complex.
Skepticism and mistrust are expressed among some residents of Kinshasa, who question the relevance of a constitutional revision in the absence of a clear justification from the leaders. For these skeptics, the country’s priorities lie elsewhere, notably in resolving urgent problems such as armed conflicts, access to water and electricity, employment and purchasing power. Amending the Constitution appears to be a political maneuver diverting attention from real national challenges.
On the other hand, there are voices in favor of adjustments and corrections to the current constitutional text. Some citizens believe that the revision can improve certain mechanisms and strengthen the functioning of institutions. However, these nuanced opinions fail to dispel the concerns and anger of those who see this initiative as a means of consolidating the power in place to the detriment of the interests of the Congolese people.
Distrust of the political class is also felt, reflecting a climate of generalized mistrust. Some see the constitutional revision as a maneuver aimed at strengthening the position of President Tshisekedi, while others accuse the opposition of fueling sterile political quarrels to the detriment of the real concerns of the population. This polarization of the Congolese political scene makes the debate around the constitutional revision even more complex and delicate.
Finally, the question of the advisability of the constitutional revision is at the heart of the concerns. While some consider it a priority to modernize institutions and meet the expectations of the population, others believe that the country must first address more pressing challenges in terms of security, public health and social well-being. The timing of this initiative is therefore hotly debated, highlighting the deep divergences on national priorities.
In short, the debate on the constitutional revision in Kinshasa reflects the divisions and tensions that run through Congolese society. Faced with a complex political and social situation, it seems essential to engage in a constructive and inclusive dialogue to overcome divisions and find viable solutions for the future of the country.