In a recent diplomatic episode at the UN, the resolution proposing an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza was put to the test. The United States vetoed the resolution, arguing that it would not have guaranteed the release of hostages held in the area.
US Deputy Ambassador Robert Wood stressed the importance of linking the end of the conflict to the release of the hostages, stating that the two goals were closely linked. The resolution presented to the UN Security Council, supported by the non-permanent members, called for an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire, as well as the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages.
However, US officials felt that the language was not strong enough, as it did not condition the ceasefire on the release of the hostages. As a result, the United States used its veto power as a permanent member of the Security Council to reject the resolution.
The other permanent members of the Security Council, including the United Kingdom, voted in favour of the resolution. Before the vote, the Israeli ambassador warned that approving the resolution would have constituted a “betrayal”.
Palestinian representatives condemned the US veto, saying it encouraged Israel to continue its actions against Palestinian and Lebanese civilians. Elected members of the Security Council who sponsored the resolution expressed deep disappointment at its rejection.
France expressed disappointment at the lack of an immediate and unconditional ceasefire, stressing the urgent need to protect civilians and ensure the provision of humanitarian aid.
The United Kingdom affirmed its determination to end the conflict, alleviate suffering in Gaza and ensure the immediate release of hostages.
The US veto raises questions about how the various parties deal with conflicts in the Middle East and illustrates the ongoing tensions within the UN Security Council. Finding a viable and balanced solution in the region remains a major challenge for the international community.