The controversy over the remuneration of deputies in the DRC: transparency and respect for the law are essential

The recent controversy in the National Assembly of the Democratic Republic of Congo raises questions about the legality of financial benefits granted to some MPs. Vital Kamerhe clarified that only 500 MPs were paid, but doubts persist regarding 13 other MPs receiving benefits as former speakers of the chambers. The lack of transparency and compliance with laws regarding remuneration underscores the need to strengthen governance and accountability of elected representatives.
Fatshimetrie recently highlighted a controversy within the National Assembly of the Democratic Republic of Congo regarding the number of deputies paid by the Republic. Indeed, during a recent plenary session, the Speaker of the Lower House of Parliament, Vital Kamerhe, clarified the situation by stating that only 500 deputies were paid, in accordance with the laws of the country.

However, questions have been raised regarding the presence of 13 other deputies who also allegedly benefit from financial advantages as former heads of parliamentary bodies, under a specific law governing former elected presidents of the Republic. This revelation has raised questions about the legality of this situation, particularly with regard to the additional expenses incurred, estimated at USD 1.5 million per year.

The Centre for Research in Public Finance and Local Development (CREFDL) drew attention to this budgetary irregularity, pointing out that the budget allocated to the National Assembly provided for the payment of 513 deputies while the law only recognized 500. This discrepancy highlighted the need to ensure transparency and compliance with the laws regarding the remuneration of deputies and former presidents of the chambers.

Vital Kamerhe stressed that, although these benefits could represent significant financial support for former presidents of the chamber, it was essential to respect the rules established by law. He also indicated his willingness to renounce these benefits, once re-elected as President of Parliament, in order to prevent any ambiguity or misunderstanding regarding his status and prerogatives.

This case highlights the complexity of the institutional structures and financial practices within the National Assembly of the Democratic Republic of Congo. It highlights the importance of transparency, accountability and compliance with the law in the management of public funds and benefits provided to elected representatives. By committing to maintaining the integrity and legality of remuneration processes, parliamentary authorities can strengthen public trust and ensure fairer and more equitable governance for all citizens.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *