**The Court of Cassation suspends the judgment of Modero Nsimba pending the decision of the Constitutional Court**
A large-scale legal case is currently shaking the political scene in the DRC. Modero Nsimba, honorary minister of Tourism and national deputy, finds himself at the heart of a legal battle. On Wednesday March 27, the Court of Cassation suspended ruling on the case of Modero Nsimba while waiting for the Constitutional Court to rule on the objections of unconstitutionality raised by his defense.
During Wednesday’s public hearing, Modero Nsimba challenged three judges from the composition for the second time for bias, asking that they step aside. The defendant’s defense raised questions about the competence of the Court of Cassation to try Modero Nsimba, asserting that he had been removed from his natural judge, the court of peace.
The unconstitutionality submitted to the Constitutional Court calls into question the validity of Modero Nsimba’s mandate as deputy, which has not yet been validated in the National Assembly. The defense also contests procedural flaws regarding the evidence presented by the prosecution.
At the heart of the debates is a voice note attributed to Modero Nsimba and widely shared on social networks. The defense accuses the prosecution of failing to conduct thorough investigations into the alleged offenses, calling into question the authenticity of the exhibit.
Despite the multiple twists and turns of the case, one question remains unanswered: where did the original version of the voice note presented go? The defense thus raises doubts about the integrity of the file presented before the Court.
This case illustrates the tensions between the political and judicial spheres in the DRC, offering a captivating judicial spectacle but also calling into question respect for rights and legal procedures. To be followed closely.
For more information on this case, you can consult the following articles:
– [Article 1 on the Modero Nsimba affair](link_1)
– [Article 2 on the decision of the Constitutional Court](link_2)
– [Article 3 on the political implications of the case](link_3)
—
In conclusion, your article must always incorporate factual elements while offering a unique and relevant angle to capture the reader’s interest. Also consider including links to other articles to enrich the reading experience.