Title: South Africa’s position in the face of the conflict between Hamas and Israel: between support for Palestine and realpolitik
Introduction :
Since the start of the war between Hamas and Israel, South Africa has taken a position in favor of Palestine. South African Foreign Minister Naledi Pandor presented her government’s position to the country’s National Assembly, calling for a ceasefire and the opening of humanitarian corridors. However, this position causes divisions within the Assembly, reflecting the different points of view on this complex conflict.
I. The ANC and its traditional support for the Palestinian cause
The ANC, South Africa’s ruling party, has always been a staunch supporter of the Palestinian cause. This party has often drawn a parallel between the Palestinian case and the history of South Africa under apartheid. Minister Naledi Pandor also underlined this perspective by declaring that the actions against the Palestinian people are unjust and intolerable.
II. Divisions within the National Assembly
Despite the ANC’s support, MPs present at the National Assembly expressed divergent views. Some elected officials, like Mbuyiseni Ndlozi of the radical left Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) party, are in favor of tougher measures against Israel, going so far as to propose recalling the South African ambassador in Israel. Others, like Democratic Alliance MP Emma Louise Powell, take a more moderate stance, criticizing the department’s lack of credibility following its diplomatic exchanges with Hamas.
III. The question of international action
Minister Naledi Pandor also regretted the lack of action from the international community, in particular from the UN Security Council and the International Criminal Court. South Africa calls for a more robust response to violations of international law committed during this conflict.
Conclusion :
South Africa’s position on the conflict between Hamas and Israel reflects divisions within the National Assembly, with traditional ANC support for the Palestinian cause on one side, and voices calling for a more measured response. The question of international action also remains an issue, with the regret expressed by Minister Naledi Pandor regarding the lack of mobilization of the UN Security Council and the International Criminal Court. This complex conflict continues to spark heated debate and raises important questions about the role of nations and international institutions in conflict resolution.