Title: The political crisis in Chad: a debate around the participation of Félix Tshisekedi
Introduction :
The political crisis in Chad takes a new turn with the recent petition launched by a group of opposition parties and civil society organizations aimed at challenging the participation of Congolese President Félix Tshisekedi as designated facilitator of the Economic Community of States of Central Africa (ECCAS). This petition, which already has more than 100 signatures in a few days, is sparking debate in N’Djamena, while political tensions are intensifying with the postponement of the return of the opponent Succès Masra.
A contested facilitator:
The initiators of the petition claim that Félix Tshisekedi has constantly supported the actions of the regime in place in Chad since his appointment as facilitator by ECCAS. According to them, his emissaries were used for cronyism and contributed to the illusion of time in order to deceive political actors. They question the credibility of Félix Tshisekedi as a promoter of democracy and express their desire to counter his influence in Chad.
The ruling party’s response:
The spokesperson for the MPS, the party of the late President Idriss Déby, who supports his son, describes this petition as sterile agitation. He recalls that the facilitator was not appointed by Chad itself, and that he is only fulfilling his mandate. According to him, the opposition is counting on the failure of facilitation, but it will experience inevitable success. He criticizes the opposition’s agitation as mere entertainment for the gallery.
Expectations disappointed:
Many observers believe that Félix Tshisekedi’s visit to N’Djamena in July should have led to a solution to the political crisis in Chad. However, they rather note that the political situation has intensified since his visit and that the postponement of the planned return of opponent Succès Masra is proof of this. If the facilitator had succeeded in his mission, the political climate would have been calmed and Succès Masra would have been able to return without problem, in accordance with his plans.
Conclusion :
Félix Tshisekedi’s participation as a facilitator in the political crisis in Chad is the subject of heated debate between supporters and detractors of his role. While some question his neutrality and actions, others argue that his presence is necessary to find a peaceful resolution to the crisis. The evolution of the political situation in Chad in the coming months will make it possible to determine the real impact of its facilitation on the country.