Relations between France and Africa have always been subject to controversy and debate. In recent years, French public opinion has been increasingly attentive to these issues, amplifying discussions around an alleged “anti-French sentiment” in Africa.
However, it is essential to distinguish between real anti-French resentment and reasoned criticism of France’s military and political action on the African continent. Many African and French intellectuals agree that this is not a rejection of France as a country, but rather a legitimate questioning of its role and influence, particularly in the Sahelian countries, but also in other West and Central African countries.
Certainly, certain African actors tend to exaggerate the extent of this influence to serve their political or economic interests. But it is undeniable that French policy has had a significant impact on the political and economic developments of many African countries since the times of decolonization. Bilateral agreements on defense and military assistance were signed in the 1960s, and these often included sections on economic cooperation in the field of raw materials, with the aim of securing France’s supplies to advantageous conditions.
It is therefore important to recognize that France’s policy in Africa has been largely motivated by geopolitical and economic interests. France, as a middle power, is committed militarily to the continent to defend its interests and consolidate its place in the world. It is absurd to think that a foreign power would intervene without its own reasons, without precise objectives. The United States is a glaring example.
Let’s take the example of the French intervention in Mali in 2013. Although this intervention took place at the request of the Malian government, it is important to emphasize that France also pursued its own objectives and adapted its means of action over the years. Furthermore, it is necessary to mention that the war in Libya, of which France was one of the key players, played a major role in the destabilization of Mali and the region.
It is therefore time to return to reason, to tame emotions and to take into account geopolitical and economic realities to find solutions to the crises affecting the Sahel. The search for scapegoats and alarmist speeches will not be enough to curb terrorist violence, coup attempts or the deterioration of living conditions. There is an urgent need to end the collective hysteria and adopt a more pragmatic and thoughtful approach.
In conclusion, relations between France and Africa are complex and deserve to be analyzed with objectivity and nuance.. It is time to move beyond the clichés and focus on the real issues that shape these relationships. Better mutual understanding and sincere cooperation could help build a more serene future between France and its African partners.