Political news in Madagascar is once again in the news with the drawing of the official numbers of the candidates for the presidential election. This symbolic moment marks the start of the electoral campaign and allows candidates to stand out and make their number known to voters.
However, this announcement was somewhat overshadowed by a new dispute concerning the interim President of the Republic. Indeed, rather than being carried out by the President of the Senate, as stipulated in the Constitution, it is the Prime Minister and a collegial government who have taken on this responsibility.
This decision sparked strong reactions among the candidates and their representatives. Some contest the fact of appointing someone other than the president of the Senate to act as interim, calling it an “institutional coup.” Others emphasize the importance of respecting constitutional texts in their interpretation.
Concern is being felt about the impact of this situation on democracy in Madagascar. The questions concern the guarantee of neutrality of the administration during the electoral process and the equality of opportunities between all candidates. Calls are being made to the government and the international community to address these concerns.
Andry Rajoelina, candidate number 3, refutes these allegations by affirming that the decision to entrust the interim to the Prime Minister was voluntary and wise. According to him, the President of the Senate was not aware of the files handled previously, which justifies this decision.
In short, the official numbers of the candidates for the presidential election of Madagascar were revealed via a draw. However, this announcement was drowned out in the controversy surrounding the interim President of the Republic. This situation raises questions about respect for constitutional texts and the fairness of the electoral process. Democracy in Madagascar is being tested, and it is essential to carefully monitor the evolution of this political situation.