Title: The constitutional projects of the historian Isidor Ndaywel are debated in the DRC
Introduction :
The recent history of the Democratic Republic of Congo is marked by intense debates around its Constitution. The renowned Congolese historian, Isidor Ndaywel, recently proposed a new constitutional project which has provoked strong reactions. Among the proposed changes, we find in particular an extension of the presidential mandate to 9 non-renewable years and a reorganization of the electoral deadlines. However, these proposals are far from unanimous and raise many questions about their relevance and their impact on the political life of the country.
1. A controversial constitutional project:
Isidor Ndaywel proposes major changes to the current Constitution of the DRC. Among the key changes, there is the extension of the presidential mandate to 9 non-renewable years, as well as legislative mandates of different lengths. The objective is to avoid potential electoral crises and to guarantee greater stability of the institutions. However, many critics question the relevance of these proposals and point out the potential risks they could pose.
2. Arguments against the proposed changes:
Several arguments are put forward to challenge Isidor Ndaywel’s proposals. First of all, it is pointed out that the elections in the DRC have been marred by irregularities for years, but this has not prevented the functioning of the institutions. Then, the question of the financial cost of regular elections every two years is raised, as well as the impact on the economic stability of the country. Moreover, the justification put forward for the 9-year term of office is not considered convincing, and the lack of comparison with other African countries raises questions.
3. An unfinished reflection:
Isidor Ndaywel’s approach is considered insufficiently developed and unsystematic. The assumption that presidents need a year to “build up” and learn how to run the country is disputed, highlighting the need for capable leaders as soon as they take office. Moreover, the 9-year term is not a norm in Africa, which raises questions about its relevance for the DRC.
Conclusion :
Isidor Ndaywel’s constitutional proposal continues to spark debate in the Democratic Republic of Congo. While some support these changes as a solution to guarantee political and institutional stability, others question their relevance and underline the potential risks they could entail. It is essential to deepen the reflection and take into account the arguments of the various actors before considering making major changes to the Constitution of the country.