The news in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is once again making headlines with the presentation of a draft new constitution by Professor Isidore Ndaywel. The latter proposes significant modifications compared to the current constitution, in force since 2006. If this proposal raises many questions and debates, it is important to take a step back to analyze in depth the approach of Professor Ndaywel.
From the outset, it should be emphasized that Professor Ndaywel insists on the scientific nature of his approach. He does not seek to engage politically, but rather to consolidate state authority and preserve the territorial integrity of the DRC. This approach deserves to be welcomed, as it is essential to strengthen the institutional foundations to guarantee the stability and development of the country.
Among the main changes proposed is the substitution of the post of Prime Minister by a Vice-President. This proposal is likely to strengthen the executive by reducing the number of key positions and further centralizing power. However, the implications of this measure should be carefully analyzed and whether it really promotes better governance.
Another major modification concerns the duration of the presidential mandate, which would increase from 5 to 9 years, non-renewable. This proposal rightly raises a lot of controversy, because it calls into question the democratic principles of presidential term limits. The DRC has already experienced episodes of longevity in power, and it is essential to find a balance between stability and the guarantee of democratic alternation.
Finally, Professor Ndaywel also proposes a revision of the notion of irrevocability of Congolese nationality, limiting it to countries bordering the DRC. This measure undoubtedly aims to better control migratory flows and to strengthen national cohesion. However, it is important to avoid any form of discrimination and to ensure that this proposal respects the principles of equality and non-discrimination.
It is undeniable that Professor Isidore Ndaywel’s draft new constitution raises many debates and questions. It is essential that civil society, legal experts and political actors can express their point of view and actively participate in the discussion in order to reach a consensus. Professor Ndaywel’s scientific approach is a first step towards an in-depth reflection on Congolese institutions, but it is essential that this reflection be inclusive and respectful of the democratic process.
In conclusion, the approach of Professor Isidore Ndaywel to propose a draft new constitution in the DRC arouses reflection and debate. While some proposals may seem relevant to strengthening state authority and preserving territorial integrity, others raise questions about respect for democratic principles. It is essential to involve all actors and conduct a thorough discussion to reach a consensus that serves the general interest of the Congolese people