Political coherence is often a rare commodity in the Congolese political landscape. However, it is interesting to observe the People’s Party for Reconstruction and Democracy (PPRD), led by Joseph Kabila, which presents a certain consistency in its position vis-à-vis the current electoral process.
From the start of the process, the PPRD accused of cheating and irregularities, considering this a coup against the political order that emerged from the 2018 elections. In particular, the party questions the consensual and representative character of the office of the Independent National Electoral Commission (CENI). From this initial “fault”, he then rejects the entire architecture of the electoral process.
We can disagree with the PPRD’s rhetoric and raise the fact that he was not always a model of virtue when he was in power. However, it is undeniable that the party remains consistent in its position throughout this electoral sequence. He collaborates with the institutions he criticizes, the CENI and the Constitutional Court. Unless it turns around and drastically changes its position, the party maintains its course. This constancy in inconstancy is a typical manifestation of Congolese politics, where Descartes’ postulate “I think therefore I am” has been adapted to “I continually change my mind, therefore I am”. Political transhumance is commonplace.
Now that we have analyzed the coherence of the PPRD, many questions arise. Does Joseph Kabila’s party really have the means to achieve its objectives? In other words, does he have enough leeway to influence the course of events and win his case? How do you turn an empty chair policy or a gamble into a masterstroke? How to convince elected officials and aspirants to political office that they are on the “good side of history” and that the game can turn in their favor?
Is it possible to ignore an entire legislature and come out stronger? Doesn’t the PPRD risk paying dearly for its political coherence? Unless the Raïs has privileged information on the mysteries of state power, allowing him to have a different perspective from that of the members of the PPRD.
In conclusion, despite the criticisms that can be leveled at the PPRD, it is interesting to note its consistency in its position vis-à-vis the current electoral process. However, the effect of this coherence remains to be seen and it is difficult to predict whether the party will really be able to influence events in its favor. Congolese politics is often subject to reversals of situation, it will therefore be necessary to follow closely the evolution of this complex political situation.